Zombie Litigation: Claim Aggregation, Litigant Autonomy and Funders' Intermeddling

The main debate surrounding litigation funding in recent years has focused on the question of disclosure of funding agreements. While the issue is important, predominantly because of its effects on the course and outcome of individual cases, far more important are bigger, interrelated questions which have systemic effects on the civil justice system, the legal profession, and the nature of the rise of portfolio funding- which I here propose to view as a new form of undisclosed and unregulated claim aggregation- has broader-still effects including clients' potential, and at times actual, loss of autonomy over their cases as their lawyers become originators, brokers and/or managers of 'litigation assets.'